Monthly Archives: January 2011

Losing the way but finding new friends: Finland

Sometimes I joke about it, or I get teased a little about my propensity for taking the wrong direction but I think it’s an intentional misdirection I choose to commit myself to instead of a general ineptitude regarding maps.

“Getting lost” or taking the wrong direction might be a source of irritation or embarrassment for some people, but I’ve always found it an opportunity to see something I might have missed, to meet someone I might never have known. A perfect example of this is my last trip to Finland.

The beginning of the adventure had been an easy one: a short, relaxed and comfortable plane ride from Berlin. One brillant summer evening, my best friends and small child had dropped my son and I off at the Tegel airport, had actually walked us to the gate. So I felt enormously happy, warm with their hugs and waves good-bye recent memories in my mind.

Finnish Air by Red Haircrow

Finnish Air by Red Haircrow

It’s a beautiful flight. You’re not too long above the clouds before soon you drop and can look down onto the waters of the gulf of Finland where regular ships can be seen either launching from or headed to Estonia or Russia.

At the hour we arrived at Vantaa International Airport, it was quiet. Small groups of travellers spoke amongst themselves, small satchels or wheeled suitcases complimented their casual business attire. For our part, we had a little. Except for the basics, my laptop and perhaps a change or two of clothing, I keep our packing light. Anything additional we might need I choose to buy or trade for locally wherever we happen to be.

I’d visited Finland before yet only for a few days, and still my knowledge of the language was virtually nil at this tiem. My Swedish was better, and some knew that, and the younger people especially spoke English well enough. I found that our taxi driver spoke German, so it was no problem at all providing the name of our lodging. Being one of the more curious types, he asked us about our reason for visiting, then asked opinion on Germany’s governmental situation during the twenty-minute or so drive to our hotel.

Instead of being inside Helsinki main, I’d deliberately chosen a hotel in the suburbs in the heart of a quaint little neighborhood. A bus could always take us further to the more popular areas and especially to the coastline which is extremely lovely, but for me there’s nothing like seeing how the “average” person lives.

Haaga Interior by Red Haircrow

Haaga Interior by Red Haircrow

The hotel was neat, newer and tastefully decorated in gold and burgundy. My first impression was of warmth and welcome. The front double doors were open and outside on the walk a couple of tables had diners laughing over drinks. My review and photo can be found at the Queer Magazine Online website in the travel section.   The perfect room for pleasure travellers and business people alike, it was neat, not overly spare and again, boasted rich colours which reminded me of home instead of generic suite.

After a superb breakfast served in their dining room, and needing to withdrawn some funds in local currency, I inquired at the front desk where a Geldautomat or automated teller machine was located. Smiling, the cheerful pale blonde young woman didn’t just give us the directions but actually printed us out a map. It was only a short walk and we set out eagerly without delay.

And I immediately took the wrong route.

Odds and Ends Shop by Red Haircrow

Odds and Ends Shop by Red Haircrow

The map was straightforward, a pen and ink affair with a simple lay-out, landmark spots to guide your way plus a boundary which stated “You’ve gone too far if you are here.” I liked that. Maybe subconsciously I lead us to that location. Instead of taking the first right, I was convinced we needed to walk further before turning.  When we reached the train tracks of “You’ve gone to far”, then I decided to turn. But the area was pretty with a few shops and houses and balconied apartment buildings.

I paused for photos again and again, to observe the bus system and other passers-by. The temperature was slightly cooler than Germany’s, pleasant and clean, the sky as vibrant, the green of leaves and shrubbery especially spectacular, but we did have an appointment to meet a local who was open to the contact so I tried to redirect my attention. I “stopped” to ask for directions.

He was a bit grimy, and his clothes looked slept in at least a day or two. The beard was scruffy, his hair unkempt. His gait was slightly unsteady as we neared.  He stopped at one corner near a bench and stood as if deciding what to do next. So I asked him where the shop with the ATM was. I started in Swedish, then English, and this he latched onto and his wandering gaze focused on my face enthusiatically.

“Are you American?” he asked.

More or less, I thought, but I only nodded.

And he came alive.

Thirty years ago when he was nineteen he’d visited New York, and he told of the wonderful sights he’d seen, and the stupid mistakes he’d made. His English was stilted but his gestures evidenced his frustration, but felt his passion and perhaps he sensed that. He gasped my hand and shook it with tears in his eyes.

“I wish I could go again but I have no money. One day I’ll have the money maybe,” he said as he abruptly wandered away.

I’d forgotten to ask him about the direction to the shop, so I stopped the next woman walking up. She was a tall, handsome woman perhaps sixty or so. When I called to her, she immediately stopped and smiled asking me a question in Finnish. I suppose we did look very lost and out of place. I didn’t understand her, but considering her age I asked her my question in Swedish which she switched to without a hitch. So we learned we were very nearby. My son, tired of my willingness to listen to life stories trekked ahead. The woman wished me well and we parted ways.

Quiet Neighborhood by Red Haircrow

Quiet Neighborhood by Red Haircrow

Money was spewed forth from the machine after anxious moments to see if it accepted my Mastercard debit. Having ascertained the landscape better than I, for I still felt turned around my son unhesitatingly lead us back another route to the hotel, without us having to backtrack. He shook his head, and I blamed the misdirection on my shoes wishing to go where they will but I reminded him we might never have learned the Finnish man’s New York story if we’d stayed on the proper path from the beginning.

Yes, yes, he said, impatient, but we’re going to be late! And so we were. Collecting backpacks at the hotel, we set out again needing to take the bus to our meeting point.

I’d met her through a travel site I’d been a member of for nearly a decade. I’d met my best friends through it as well, previously mentioned in my memoir post Berlin Underground &  Catwalks though they’d simply been a pair of lovers responding to a general invitation to meet over drinks while I was in Berlin.

She worked at Vantaa airport in the hangar staff, was as relaxed and open as everyone else we’d met. We spent a pleasant afternoon roaming the sights of Helsinki before her scheduled work hour arrived. My son had half-fallen in love I think for her long-legged stride and wonderfully healthy air was attractive, and he looked at her shyly when she spoke. Normally rather reserved around new people, I was both confounded and proud when he recounted with an excessive of detail my mistakes of the morning, as well as a few I’d fallen into on other walkabouts.

She laughed with him, listening to his pre-teen enthusiasm with the respect and steady gaze usually some westerners only reserve for adults.

“With this is mind, I’ll give you my number just in case you need help and no one is around. Savonlinna basically has one stop, so you can’t miss it but with you,” she said, sliding her blue gaze to me, “I am not entirely sure.”

Olavinlinna in Savolinna

Olavinlinna in Savolinna

We were there in time for the annual Opera Festival held annually at the beautiful city of Savonlinna, but I made it a point to call her again anyway.

10 Comments

Filed under Personal Entries, Photos

Love: “Variations on a Theme”

Sometimes a poem always comes to me. One which has been a favorite since I first read it thirty years ago. A poem which always reminded me of myself even before I understand what it fully might mean, and after I’ve have frenetic times of passion, violence and love.

The Lady of Shallott (1888) by John Waterhouse

The Lady of Shallott (1888) by John Waterhouse

The Lady of Shallott by Lord Alfred Tennyson
(in portion)

“There she weaves by night and day
A magic web with colours gay.
She has heard a whisper say,
A curse is on her if she stay
To look down to Camelot.
She knows not what the curse may be,
And so she weaveth steadily,
And little other care hath she,
The Lady of Shalott.

And moving through a mirror clear
That hangs before her all the year,
Shadows of the world appear.
There she sees the highway near
Winding down to Camelot;
There the river eddy whirls,
And there the surly village churls,
And the red cloaks of market girls
Pass onward from Shalott.

Sometimes a troop of damsels glad,
An abbot on an ambling pad,
Sometimes a curly shepherd lad,
Or long-hair’d page in crimson clad
Goes by to tower’d Camelot;
And sometimes through the mirror blue
The knights come riding two and two.
She hath no loyal Knight and true,
The Lady of Shalott.

But in her web she still delights
To weave the mirror’s magic sights,
For often through the silent nights
A funeral, with plumes and lights
And music, went to Camelot;
Or when the Moon was overhead,
Came two young lovers lately wed.
“I am half sick of shadows,” said
The Lady of Shalott.”

How is it when you love someone?  When it is not a matter of touch, or shared goals or sex and such things? How is it when it is pure ideal?

I read a review from an incredulous female reader who discounted the possibility or likelihood of men who were attracted to each other still staying apart and never truly interacting for years. That person obviously does not know the possibility of gay relationships or those who are involved in them.

I love someone. I’ve loved him a long time. Almost ten years. Such if the nature of people who’ve made choices and then respected them. The men who had questions or had loved other men but did choose to marry a woman and naturally have children and keep a life together. You still may love someone else, or fantasize of same sex love, but you respect the bond you’ve made, the partner you’ve allied yourself to. You don’t cheat on them even if in your mind and heart emotionally you are more connected to someone else, another man.

That is what keeps two people apart who continue to respect the lives they had previously chosen and been a part of. For many love is never easy and relationships can be pure hell.

And so I romanticized myself as “The Lady of Shallott”, not withstanding I wasn’t a “lady”. I knew what it was to either love someone and they didn’t love you in return, or seeing someone and falling helplessly into a passionate connection to them which cannot be fulfilled. Loving someone who loves someone else…that is indeed an exceptional agony.

So this connects to my writing. Sometimes people have a difficult life or personality which has the need to create a happily ever after ending no matter what, but that is something for which I have no ability or need to emulate although I can well understand.

Maybe because I’ve been buffetted emotionally (among other things), seen, observed, experienced and survived so much in my own life plus my cultural heritage and personality….that a HEA is not something which in anyway seems logical or believable even if in a fiction genre. It is neither satisfying or enjoyable most of the time. The ability to overcome and/or learn something for a situation or relationship, even if it was not successful, is what is highest to me. The continuation of growth. The zen of unlearning and continual learning which sees nothing as static or defined. It sees nothing as expected or intentional. One is always learning.

Some people read fiction to escape. I read fiction to experience the variety real people can create in a fictional setting of what is real and utterly the complexities that is life. I do not accept formulas as rote. I do not regard those who limit themselves to one minimalistic ideal or perceived reality.

Love has no one definition, nor a thousand or a million. It is different for people, every single one, even if we sometimes agree on a certain representations. That is the same of what some term as “gay love” or “hetero love”, or any other intergender or transgendered reality.

Loss is loss. Pain is pain. Agony is agony.

Those who say they cannot identify with a plot or theme of love just because it involves two men or two women in comparison to a man and a woman, has not truly understood what love is.

Love has no gender or bounds. It has no formulas. It has no “should be’s” or “shouldn’t be’s”. Those who compartmentalize love, lovers and living in such ways have not understood or truly experienced love because they still possess the ability to discount or scorn the possibility of it in others who simply love a different way.

8 Comments

Filed under Gay, Writing and Writers

The Author Profile

From writers of everything from portable generator reviews to generation spanning epic fiction, most publishers request a profile or “bio” of some sort. I don’t know where those writers get the inspiration from or suggestion on what to include, but for those in the world of fiction, sometimes the end results leave me completely mystified.

On one’s own site, or website profiles which have more than a maximum of 140 characters allowed, writers then have the decision of what to include for mere browsers but more especially and hopefully for potential readers (buyers) to make them attracted enough to take a chance and spend their money.

So what’s your preference? What kind of author profile do you like?

Thinking back to my earliest days of reading (if it was available) the addendum in a book which included the writer’s information, most of what I read was a listing of the author’s more notable works. This is in print form, mind you. Also it might have included their country of origin, university experience or perhaps the reality of a spouse.

In the electronic age, it is less limited in the space you might include such info. But how long? How much? Witty and eclectic or educated and bibliographed? Of course, it would certainly depend on your genre, because you wouldn’t include the names of your potted plants on a educational and heavily peer reviewed journal article of psychology.

Even if you are writing in the fiction genre, for me, reader interaction should be very simple. An offering of relevant or interesting information about yourself should be “real” not just something which might seem clever to a certain demographic yet considered inane and irrelevant to others.

Ah! But maybe one’s author profile/information is about assuming who you and your writing will appeal to.

A short list of my pet peeves in author’s profile?

 

1) The mention of their potted plants names. (Curious and suggestive of a quirky personality but what’s the relevance?)

2) Of how many cats they have or how “human” they are and what observations they make. (That’s like believing everyone thinks your children are as cute as you do)

3) Ones which don’t really say anything at all or are completely irrelevant in a certain way: “So-and-so is a writer who lives on the edge, drinks coffee six times a day and believes there is life after death.”

When I first wrote my webpages at GLBT Bookshelf, Smashwords, my Facebook fanpage and other locations, I included information which was superfluous and although I thought it pertinent to help a reader understand me more, for many it could just as easily have pushed them away. Certainly someone might have questioned the necessity of the info, and still question some of the info I currently include.

My thoughts on intercultural perspectives and even why I began writing were points that didn’t need to be made. Although I don’t have a problem with someone being passionate about ideals or causes, in a general posting, on a general website…there wasn’t a need for me to say any such thing. I simply needed to introduce myself.

Be assured I do not discount or think slightingly of a person who chooses to do, nor would I try to offer correction unless they specifically asked my opinion. That attitude is what I personally experienced from writers who were more “established” in the market, both by their own words and egos.

People are different. That’s all. And how they express themselves shouldn’t be judged hastily without knowing them. Nor should assumptions be made as to what they’re trying to say or the “ascertaining” of some kind of underlying meaning. I am a psychology graduate student and even from the more than average studies I’ve made into personality assessment and observation, I wouldn’t even begin to try to “judge” or categorize someone without having spend considerable time speaking with them. I am not discounting the instinctual or gut feeling some people tend to make about others, known or unknown, but even those things must needs have an open mind attached to them and a frame of true knowledge/reference or they are essentially useless.

I like a more detailed biography of an author if the application allows. Somehow it speaks to me of their personality, of themselves and their intentions. Within those words they do reveal incalculateable things about themselves for good or for ill. I seldom find it ill, however. When a writer’s profile seems to deliberately set up a kind of subterfuge to distract the reader, I find that off-putting.

Most of my fictional writing involves gay characters or themes in a life situation which includes both understandably difficult times but also periods of joy or camraderie. My works take into account and includes the very real life experiences I’ve had. I want my writing to speak for itself, but in this age of electronic book saturation, most readers have so much they have to wade through to actually reach the kind of books they wish to read. Many wish to be able to make a decision on what to purchase without having to “jump through hoops” or read a psych profile.

Some readers rely on recommendations from friends or others (something I rarely do) or they return to authors they’ve previously purchased and been entertained by. It seems less people are willing to take a chance on newcomers who don’t “do a certain seductive and directed dance” even though the price of downloading one eBook is often less than 80 or 90% of what they would spend for new hardcover release. I don’t blame them, because with the technological age almost anyone can publish their imaginings but it doesn’t mean it’s reasonable or enjoyable.

After requesting from Mark Coker that information about my review site Flying With Red Haircrow be listed at Smashwords I recently had an influx of requests. I was thankful for each one, and hoped they’d read my author profile and why I do reviews. Yet the outstanding aspect of the emails I received was the author information, all of which had included some sentences except one. Including author info doesn’t influence what I may think about their work after I read it, but it revealed something about me of their “person”. Some were general profiles which certainly were posted elsewhere online, but some were typed out. They were willing to take a chance to tell themselves about me. They trusted me with their work, their creation. To me that’s a sacred trust.

I’ve have someone in stages of reviewing work of mine instead of simply dismissing something or some situation they didn’t understand, choose to write and ask me a few questions. Instead of assuming what someone named Red Haircrow might write and the reasons for it, even if they’d read my profile or bio on various sites, they wanted a greater insight beyond “word count”. From their own view of why they thought someone might be writing such a story, they were presented with the reality of what the story and characters were representing. They choose to actively view the story, setting and author from a wider angle than what they went into the story expecting. That is exactly my point in writing anything, to try to expand the reader’s view of the world or actually introduce them into the world I’ve lived.

These days, some readers don’t seem to understand they are reading an author’s work, not JUST an entertaining story which has been geared to entertain them. Sometimes it seems from other reviews I’ve read, some readers have lost the literary aspect of what books mean. But, just the same, many writers write now just to cater to a certain niché of readers. It’s a profession. It’s something to do more and more of to gain fans and revenue. I can’t fault that, everyone is different about why they write. I don’t question it either because many publishers are saavy to the razor’s edge sharp. They, of course, want to turn out which will draw, keep readers and make them money. Even established readers of one genre have found themselves presented to the reality by agents/publishers they must write about vampire or shifters characters because that is what is the hottest thing going these days, though m/m fiction is strongly trending.

So in some ways, a simple thing like an author’s profile can be reflective of genre markets also. So many want easily breezeable books (or those who cater to their personal tastes) they can readily identify with. Books descriptions, if even slightly ambiguous, are those many might pass on for more predictable offerings. With an author’s profile, if it’s superficial, flippant, or obviously funny/sexual/provocative, many just go with it. Just as they seek a pointed yet still light read, heavy on drama, light on literary aspects, they may pass on author who chooses to present more than just “reality TV” banter.

It’s a balance writers have to make at some point, although it can be changed or modified later. First impressions can be de rigeur with many and keep the more superficial reader from researching more about an author or reading their work.

I don’t regret anything I’ve posted or later modified for that matter. I am who I am. I am, on average, and not from my own opinion, more candid than most. Yet I’ve become more cognizant of what some people might think about me BEYOND what I’ve posted on my author profile. I am me, but it would be entirely stupid not to consider what might be said or misinterpreted about me which could affect many things. Sales are not my concern although of course it can also be a measure of those considering my writing, and what someone thinks of me…that’s something I know I can never change or influence if someone chooses to be think badly of me.

Give the names of your potted plants if you must, and provide those quirky affectations of your furry friends if the need moves you. It must be popular and acceptable because so many writers, high sales and exposure down to the new kid on the block, continue to do so.

Make your author profile what is really you, even if it is only 140 characters alá the Twitter requirement for “tweets”. Take into consideration the suggestions of your agent or publisher or those you consider more experienced in the profession, but never lose your own persona. Never lose yourself or present something which does not reflect utterly which is you.

2 Comments

Filed under Writing and Writers